It's like a big smash up of Burning Wheel, BRP, and every single skill system I've ever read, all at once and forever.
You
have skill slots equal to your Intelligence score. You can
pick up as many skills as you want, but once you run out of skill
slots, you need to start overwriting them.
There
is no skill list. You're grown-ups. If you want to be good at using a rope, then just write it on your character sheet.
Caveats:
- “Thievery” is too broad of a skill. Use “burglary”, “pick-pocketing”, etc.
- “Wizard knowledge” is also too broad. Use “necromancy”, “dead languages”, etc.
- There is no "diplomacy" skill. Roleplay it and/or roll under your Cha.
- There is no "search" skill. Tell the DM where you are looking.
- There is no "perception" or "bluff" skill either.
There
is some wiggle room. Can “mountaineering” climb a wall?
Probably. Ask your DM.
Every
skill you have can be represented by a number from 1 to 16, called
the rank. To attempt a skill, roll a d20. If you roll on-or-under
your skill rank, you succeed. If you succeed by 10 points or more,
it is a critical success, and you can choose an adjective to describe
exactly how you succeed, like “irreversibly”, “reversibly”,
“quietly”, or “impressively”. If you roll a natural 20, you
have rolled a fumble, and the DM will invent some dire
consequences.
The highest you can raise a skill is 10 + character level. Or 16. Whichever is lower.
The highest you can raise a skill is 10 + character level. Or 16. Whichever is lower.
Assumed Skills and Untrained Ranks
You
are assumed to be literate, proficient in basic physical skills (running,
jumping, climbing, swimming), familiar with your own background
(the culture of your social group, the geography of your homeland,
and the language of your people) and anything else that makes sense.
For these skills, you have an untrained rank equal to whatever the
most relevant stat is.
For skills in which you are non-proficient, you have an untrained rank equal to half of whatever the most relevant stat is.
Gaining New Skills
You
start the game with 2 skills at Rank 10. Roll one skill on your
racial table, and another skill on your class table. Thieves roll
twice on each table, and so start with 4 skills at Rank 10.
You
gain new skills by announcing “I want to start learning this
skill.” and then writing it down on your character sheet at a
starting rank equal to your untrained rank (half the relevant stat
for most skills).
You
learn Int-based skills (lores) a little differently. You
begin learning a lore when you start studying it in a school or
library, or from a tutor. There are some exceptions to this. You
can learn “wilderness lore” by living in the woods, or “goblin
lore” by dissecting a lot of goblins. Use your common sense. All lores start at Rank 1.
Advancing Skills
You
advance a skill by using it. When you use a skill and succeed, put a
check mark next to it. When you have a few days to relax in town (usually
between adventures) you can erase all three check marks and roll a d20. If that d20 roll is equal-to-or-higher than the
current skill Rank, the Rank improves by 1. Note that Ranks are
limited by level (Max Rank 11 at level 1, for example).
You
advance a lore by studying it. You can raise a lore by 1 point when you either (a) studying a
new source for a week, or (b) studying an old source for a year. A
source can be a book, a library, a sage, or whatever. New sources are much faster, and so it pays to travel to foreign libraries and seek out distant sages.
There is a lot of weakness in this system, but it is balanced by the fact that you could not train perception. I used a similar system once and the spot skill was through the roof for every players that abused using it.
ReplyDeleteI know I'm 5 years too late but for anyone else that has a similar issue. If players say they want to perceive, and there is nothing to do it's not even a check.
DeletePerhaps a part that was missed in the post was that you shouldn't be asking for skill checks that have no stakes, or can be done given a reasonable amount of time. However this is mentioned in other posts in this very blog.
I always remove perception from my games, as a skill. If the characters want to look around, they either notice (1) obvious things if they're doing it quickly, or (2) notice everything if they're doing it slowly and carefully.
DeleteIMO, Perception as a skill is boring because you always have a few characters that maximize it. What's more interesting is asking a group "How much time do you want to spend looking around?", especially when the game in-world time pressure to be efficient (random encounters, Underclock, etc.)