Pages

Sunday, January 15, 2023

Some Words on Dwarven Gender

 Gender

The two dwarven genders are miner and blacksmith.

Gender is among the first ways we describe someone, along with age, name, and where they're from.  "My new boss is this woman from Texas."  Most of the time you don't even have to say whether someone is a man or a women, since the pronouns do it for you.

Dwarves do the same thing.  "What's their name?  What's their craft?"

So it will come as no surprise that dwarven have pronouns indicate profession.

Gender and Profession

Of course, miner is used in both the literal sense (they literally mine ores) and the general sense, as in anyone who collects raw goods might also be referred to as a miner.  (The word is unfortunately ambiguous when translated.)

And literally translating blacksmith is also misleading, too, since it can also refer to anyone who transforms raw materials into a more unfinished state.

Human: "So your mason is also a blacksmith?"

Dwarf: (Rolls eyes.) "They don't work with metal.  I told you they work with stone.  But of course, yes, they're a blacksmith."

Human: "Huh?"

That's what they put on their tombstones.  Instead of "devoted mother and wife" you'll encounter "diligent mason and bondholder".

Some parts are non-intuitive.  Warriors are usually considered to be miners, except for cavalry, who are considered blacksmiths.  Of course, in a war, everyone fights.  It's just that miners are expected to fight, while blacksmiths are not.

Which seems a little bit silly to humans.  "Surely you still need miners during a war, and surely a blacksmith can fight as well as a miner?"  It's a cultural norm, not a rational decision.

Gender and Names

Human names are gendered.  You can usually tell someone's gender just by their name.  Tabitha is a girl.  Scott is a boy.

Dwarven names are the same.  Oskerval is a miner.  Gathron is a blacksmith.

Dwarves give themselves their own names when they are young.  It is considered important for dwarven children to have good role models of both genders.

Gender and Language

Dwarven pronouns are also built around the same divide.  They don't have he/she.  Instead they have a different set of pronouns based on whether you are talking about a miner (raw material collector) or a blacksmith (manufacturer of finished goods).

Even dwarven nouns are gendered in this way.  (It's a bit like German in that way.)  It doesn't always make sense.

A pickaxe is a miner, but a shovel is a blacksmith.  Rubies are miners, diamonds are blacksmiths.

Birds are neuter.

Is Gender Even the Right Word?

Not really.  It's not quite like how we use gender, but "gender" is the closest thing that we have for the dwarven concept.  It's probable that the roles for blacksmith and miner evolved out of the types of gender roles that humans are familiar with, so it's possible that dwarves were like us, once.

Dwarves see the world in a certain way that makes them want to put everything and everyone into these two fundamental categories.  A person is either a miner or a blacksmith.  Even animals and objects have associations as one or the other.  

Humans do the same thing with gender.  Cats are kinda feminine, dogs are kinda masculine.  "Don't be catty." "You dog!"

Among dwarves, snakes are kinda minery and goats are kinda blacksmithy.  If a dwarf calls you a snake, he's not accusing you of lying--he's saying that you have a lot of the negative traits associated with miners.

There is a little bit of prejudice against miners.  Most fathers desire blacksmiths.

by Sergio Artigas

How Dwarves See Humans

Imagine a man who goes to a faraway place to visit a new people.

The foreign men there are a little odd, having characteristics of both men and women.  That's fine, though.  The man can handle people that are a little genderfluid.

But then half of them AREN'T LIKE THAT!  HALF OF THEM ARE JUMBO-SIZED CHILDREN WITH TUMORS ON THEIR CHESTS!  

That's how dwarves see women, with their high-pitched voices and smooth chins.

A dwarf goes to visit a human city.  The men are easy enough to interact with.  A lot of them shave their faces (which makes them look like children--like someone wearing a diaper in public) and most of them of genderfluid (they transition between miner and blacksmith all the time--not even like transitioning once in their life, but they switch back and forth daily.)   That's okay, though, the dwarf can handle people that are a little genderfluid.

So even human men tend to make dwarves uneasy.  Younger dwarves tend to be cool with it.  They'll just smile and say "That's fine!  That sort of thing doesn't bother me at all!  If a human wants to shear a sheep and then weave it into cloth himself, that's fine!  I don't judge him.  I'm not a bigot!"

Dwarven elders tend to be more conservative.  (This is an understatement.)

Women are a much stranger concept for dwarves, and if a dwarf hasn't been around humans for very long, expect lots of staring.  Dwarves are also more comfortable talking to men, especially men with beards, and especially men with beards who fall neatly into either the miner or blacksmith category.

This is why dwarves who emigrate to human cities tend to seek out blacksmiths or other crafters early on.  (Cities are full of crafters.)  And since most dwarves who emigrate are miners, in the few cases where a dwarf falls in love with a human, it's inevitably some sort of crafter.

Dwarven Women

Human: "So how come I never see any dwarf women?"

Dwarf: "Eh?  What's a wimmin?"

Human: (laughs and points at a woman) "That's a woman.  What are dwarf women like?"

Dwarf: (getting red in the face) "NO SIR!  There are no dwarven women!"

So you can see how the confusion originally arose.  

But the dwarf is right--there are no dwarven "women".  Dwarves don't have a high degree of sexual dimorphism, and their society lacks any comparable role.

Do Dwarves Identify as Male or Female?

Once dwarves are introduced to the human concept of gender, nearly all of them identify as men.  (They didn't realize that we sorted ourselves by gender, like farm animals or something.)

Most of them have a harder time relating to women in the beginning, mostly because they lack beards and have high pitched voices.  To dwarves, they seem like mutant children.

And to humans, all dwarves look like men, so humans assume them to be male, and address them as such.  To dwarves, the whole distinction is rather pointless ("why does it matter so much?") so they don't really care what gender humans assign them.  They have more important things to do.  Fool humans.

Gender Coding Among Dwarves

There's a lot of little behaviors that can make someone seem more masculine or feminine.  Sitting with your legs crossed.  Watching sporting events.  Wearing tight pants.

Dwarves have even more of these than humans do.  Once you've lived among dwarves for a while, you'll notice that there are hundreds of little things that miners do differently from blacksmiths.  Miners tend to stack their fists when they sit at a table--blacksmiths almost always lay their hands flat.  Blacksmiths wear pockets on their chests, but miners never do.  This extends to how they hold mushrooms during meals, how they stack coins, how they hold shovels, how they braid their beards, how they laugh, and how they sneeze.

And when humans go to dwarven citadels, they fuck this up constantly.

Dwarves like to be clean, like anyone else, but miners are expected to be a little bit dirty.  After a bath, a miner will sometimes apply a little black paint under the tips of their fingernails, so they look a bit dirty.  Or a quick smudge of kohl on the cheek, enough to look casual.

Dwarven Sexuality and Romance

The primary engine for dwarven sexuality is labor.

Dwarves become attracted to other dwarves for a few reasons, but the largest one is their work.  A blacksmith might be impressed by the quantity of a miner's ores, or by their skill in prospecting them.  A miner might be impressed by a blacksmith's steady hand.

There are plenty of stories of a dwarf encountering a hammer, falling in love with the craft of it, and then seeking out the dwarf that made the hammer, already enraptured.

Dwarven gender and dwarven sexuality are closely linked.  When two dwarves fall in love, it's always a miner and a blacksmith.  When two dwarves move in together, it's always a miner and a blacksmith who are in love with each other.  Dwarves have a hundred reasons why that's natural and correct.

Sometimes miners fall in love with miners, though.  Or a blacksmith falls in love with a blacksmith.  These unions are (kindly) regarded as misguided, or (harshly) seen as disgusting and bad for society.  The two dwarves in question are usually shunned or exiled.  In some cases they are killed.

Dwarven society is very repressive in its own way.

Dwarven romance is actually highly analogous to human romance.  There is a large emphasis on gift-giving, though, and a weirdly high value placed on punctuality.  When a couple exchanges money, they use envelopes, and the money is not counted by the recipient.

"Sexuality" isn't quite the right word, either, but they do have sex.  Why did you think they were so eager to move in with each other?

I won't go into the details, but I will say that dwarves are not as obsessed with their genitals as we are.

The reason you don't see dwarves making out all the time is because most of the dwarves you'll meet outside of the citadels are all minersTheir blacksmiths are all at home (and their miners miss them dearly).

Additionally: dwarves are all pretty faithful in their relationships, but even if they weren't, why would a miner want to kiss a miner?

Dwarves also use possessives to refer to their partner.  "my wife" "my husband" "my blacksmith" "my miner".  This also causes misunderstandings.

Dwarven Reproduction

Reproduction is something completely different from sexuality.

In fact, dwarves think it's kinda gross that humans think the two things are the same.

Of course, dwarves understand that among animals, the boys hump on the girls and that's where babies come from.  They raise plenty of domesticated animals; they are not stupid.

But the separation of sex from reproduction is one of the primary things that separates us from animals.  And in fact, it's boggling that humans have so little self-control over it.  It's as fundamental to society as using a toilet instead of shitting in your front yard.  That's what makes us civilized.  Why can't humans separate the two?

The reasons that a dwarf might want to have a child should sound familiar: it's to have (a) an heir, (b) an apprentice, (c) a family, (d) to give/receive love, (e) to give meaning to their life, (f) to fix the mistakes of their parents, (g) to give someone else a good start in the world, (h) someone to pass their debt on to, so their tomb isn't resold after they die, (i) their father expects them to.

All the same reasons that humans have kids for (except for maybe the debt thing).

When a dwarf wants a child, they prefer to adopt.  Dwarves love adoption.  You get to skip a lot of the unproductive years that way, and the kid will still be loyal to you when they grow up.  (Maybe "loyal" is the wrong word.  Adult dwarven children have a shocking amount of legal and financial obligations to their parents.  Marriages can be annulled, but the obligation that a dwarf owes his father can never be discharged.)

When there are no young dwarves to adopt, a baby will be made the old fashioned way.

The father is the one who pays for the baby.

The father might supply seed, field, or neither.  

Paying for seed is cheap.  Paying for field is expensive.  But when you're done, the new father gets a lovely baby to raise, and everyone is happy.  So many tiny clothes to make!

Dwarves don't care much if their sons are related to them.  It's seen as a little bit prideful if all of your sons are related to you.  A dwarf will probably hire one or two genetic parents based on their rates and the quality of the expected offspring.  The spouse may or may not be one of these dwarves.  The prospective father may or may not be one of these dwarves.

If there is a dwarf you greatly admire, you may want to hire them to be a genetic parent to one of your sons.  It's not rare for dwarves to hire their debtholders to be genetic parents for one of their children, but if their debtholder has a uterus, they probably can't afford it.  Paying for field is so expensive because the dwarf usually has to take time off of work.

The dwarf's spouse is not especially involved in this process, although they are on the short list of dwarves that are considered when choosing a genetic parent.  Most dwarves admire their spouses, after all.  But it's also common for spouses to never father* each other's children, even when they have compatible genitals.  Reproduction has nothing to do with gender.

Honestly, it's far more civilized than whatever humans do.

*In this sentence, it's still "fathering" even if you're the one supplying the uterus.  Sorry if this blogpost is so confusing--English doesn't have a good vocabulary for dwarven gender and reproductive roles.

Mothers and Fathers

Dwarves don't have mothers.  They only have fathers.  

I would describe dwarven society as hyper-patriarchal, but without any women in society, the term is kinda hollow.

Dwarves don't deal well with the concept of shared ownership.  "This baby belongs to both the mother and the father."  Huh?  That's all just dumb shit that humans say.

Dwarf: "So who owns this house, then?"

Man: "Well, I share it with my wife."

Dwarf: (rolling his eyes) "But who owns it rightfully?  If you got a divorce, who would get it?"

Man: "That depends.  We'd probably have to go talk to a judge."

Dwarf: (under his breath) "So the bloody judge knows who the house belongs to, but the man paying taxes on it has no clue.  Fucking incredible, I swear to Gox."

Fathership is a type of ownership.  The young dwarf has rights, of course, but they also have a great many obligations to their father.

Young dwarves dread their birthdays, because that's when their father usually presents them with the itemized list of parenting fees for the last year, and reviews their debt repayment plan.

However, dwarves do have uncles, which is a formal legal status reserved for the brothers of the father.  It is also frequently extended to their spouse, close friend, or debtholder.

In rare cases, it is sometimes even extended to the other genetic parent.

Previous Dwarven Culture Posts

A Few Words on Dwarven Culture

A Few More Words on Dwarven Culture

Dwarven Architecture

The Dwarves of Mt. Doldrum

A Disclaimer

Dwarven culture is not monolithic (even though dwarves will insist that it is.)

This blog post mostly refers to the dwarves of:

  • the Seventh Citadel and all its sons and grandsons.
  • the Third Citadel of the Fifth Citadel, and all its sons.
  • a couple of orphaned citadels in Tramaldea, part of the Cordyceps Diaspora
So if anything in my posts seems to contradict itself, don't worry!  I was just talking about slightly different dwarves.

36 comments:

  1. A good chuckle :)

    "Paying for seed is cheap. Paying for field is expensive." Some sort of wild wisdom in this, applied generically too.

    Dug.

    ReplyDelete
  2. so... who decides whether a dwarf is a miner or a blacksmith?? do dwarves simply pick their own gender? is it decided by the community? can a dwarf transition later in life, is there a concept of dwarven gender dysphoria?

    not 100% sure how I feel about this shit from, like, an academic queer theory perspective, which I'm tragically a fucking nerd about BUT it's definitely a step up from almost every other take on dwarf women I've seen lol.

    curious if you've heard about Thomas Laqueur's one-sex model of gender/sex in Medieval Europe! bc like the "sex binary" as it exists today is a pretty modern concept, and I've got mixed feelings about applying it to dwarves but simultaneously divorcing it from reproductive labor? but that's all just my nitpicking lol

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm interested in hearing the queer theory / gender theory perspective, honestly. It's something I wish I knew more about.

      Dwarves pick their own gender. I left transitioning an open question--I don't have a good lore answer yet.

      I will look up Laqueur's one-sex model.

      Delete
    2. Reading up on the one-sex model: this is really fascinating stuff. I will be stealing parts of it. Dwarves also "regard organs and their placement as epiphenomena of a greater world order"

      Never thought much about "female semen" but I'm glad Galen is on the case.

      Also interesting to see orgasms as a basis for egalitarianism.

      Other academics might attach Laquer's theories for being a bit reductionistic but dwarves love reductionism.

      Delete
    3. Speaking of the mixing of fluids: Would that mean that dwarves have an easier time fashioning exowombs? Just saying: Perhaps their pinnacle of civilization is that no one has to give birth like some animal.

      Delete
    4. aight, so I was mulling over it from a queer-theory standpoint my big critique I guess is that this whole thing lacks any real teleology of gender. Like, if you look at how the modern Western gender binary became reified, it clearly serves a variety of practical ideological functions. for example, you had racial-hegemony types in the 1800s arguing that Europeans were superior to other races BECAUSE of the sexual dimorphism present in the White race, and a perceived over-similarity between genders in non-Whites (Black women were too "masculine," Asian men were too "feminine") was proof of White superiority. just one example. anyway the gender binary system as we have it today isn't just accidental, isn't just a quirk of biology or some shit, it's teleologically rooted in larger ideological systems. in this article, you basically take the modern binary for granted, take enough chunks from it wholesale to make it broadly recognizable to modern readers ("homosexuality" frowned upon, et cetera) and then add a bunch of fantasy crap while divorcing it from elements of reproductive labor. which... idk, the end result is definitely cool and thought-provoking, but it's all clearly just a riff on "what if modern gender binary but different" rather than a reflection of actual diverse global understandings of gender. idk, this is all just me rambling, don't take any of this seriously lmao

      I'm a little intrigued by the parallels to Butch/Femme roles in "traditional" lesbian culture, right, where relationships were basically assumed to always consist of one butch, one femme, and there were social roles that came with that (butches work "masculine" jobs, femmes are housewives or do sex work, et cetera) that are essentially simulacra of heterosexual relations. There's a scene in Leslie Feinberg's Stone Butch Blues where Jes, the titular stone butch, is viscerally horrified at the idea of two butches being in a relationship together. "but which of you is THE butch?" ... and it reads as comedy today, the idea of a masculine lesbian suddenly becoming bizarrely homophobic when confronted with a butch4butch relationship, but there's depth to it lol. (also, everyone should fucking read Stone Butch Blues, it's so fucking good.)

      anyway, dwarves choosing their own gender. that's a big one. that's kinda huge, actually, and the fact that you don't really address it is probably my biggest gripe with this thing, because THAT'S where suddenly dwarven "gender" diverges massively from human gender (especially the modern gender binary) and it blossoms into its own thing. how old is a dwarf when he picks his gender? is he typically raised as neuter, or is it expected that parents might hoist certain gender expectations prior to him "coming out" ? (oh, come cook with me, child, you're such a good cook...) since names are gendered, does the dwarf just go without a name until he picks a gender, and if so, who names him after? god, there's so much to it. what happens if a dwarf simply refuses to pick a gender? you might note the five-gender system of the Bugis people in Indonesia, where the "neuter" gender takes on special spiritual roles, but is also expected to remain celibate...

      anyway, kinda wanna write a short story about a young dwarf who's always shown, y'know, blacksmith tendencies, cooking, crafting, all that shit, everyone expects him to be a blacksmith, but is in love with an older dwarf who's already a blacksmith, so the younger dwarf becomes a miner so they can be together... the gender, the yearning, it's terrible lol. (no, it's definitely not loosely autobiographical, the fact that I'm a trans girl terribly in love with another trans girl but she's straight definitely has NOTHING to do with this fuck)

      Delete
    5. Thank you for the thoughtful essay!

      Reading summaries of Stone Butch Blues now--it does sound pretty complex, and painful.

      My dwarves don't have any of that complexity because--like you said--they're just a repainted version of our own gender binary.

      One reason for why: I want audiences to be able to relate to it, a little bit. It feel more thought-provoking that way. If I wrote up a dwarven society that had 3 or 5 genders, fewer people would read it and see elements of their own lives in it. I think speculative fiction works best when it's just *slightly* outside of our own experience and imagination.

      Two: dwarves are hella conservative and they like rigid binaries.

      Three: there's some secret setting lore that all of the races are transhumans that returned to Earth (?) after long millennia away. Dwarves used to be humans, and probably still carry remnants of our familiar human gender binary.

      And you're also correct about dwarven children being the one big part where dwarves diverge from "repainted normal gender stuff". I didn't get into it because (1) I couldn't come up with anything that very compelling, and (2) the post was already getting pretty long. But if I had to come up with something, I would say. . .

      Dwarven children are just referred to as "Oskerval's Son" or "Oskerval's Second Son". They don't really have names of their own. Adulthood is when they choose their careers, become legally responsible for their own debts, and choose their names (with their father's approval).

      Dwarf dads are always gendering their children. (Because we are always gendering our babies--asking four-year-olds who their boyfriend is, etc). So of course, dwarf dads have a lot of expectations, and a lot of potential conflict.

      The weirdest part is that when a kid figures out that they are a miner, it's not because they like mining--it's because they are attracted to blacksmiths.

      Which is crazy, because it's like choosing law school over medical school because doctors get you all hot and bothered. Not because a law career appeals to you on its own merits.

      Love is hard; good luck to everyone afflicted by it.

      Delete
    6. Actually that bit about dwarf children is actually pretty good. I should update the blog post.

      God, I can imagine some shitty fights that dwarf kids have with their dwarf dads. "NO SON OF MINE IS GOING TO BE A MINER! YOU'RE TOO GOOD IN THE SHOP! YOU HAVE A FUTURE THERE!"

      Because their sexuality is all tangled in with their careers.

      Delete
    7. Also I think that people are gradually realizing that sexual orientation isn't a *choice* but I don't think that dwarves are fully onboard that train.

      Delete
    8. No wonder dwarves leave the citadels to go on adventures.

      Delete
    9. omg, I love that, complex intersections and entanglements between gender, sexuality, and career. so then a "homosexual" relationship between two blacksmiths might just be because both chose their career inclinations over their sexualities as young adults-- they were both always attracted to blacksmiths but also GOOD AT blacksmith stuff and so they ended up as gay blacksmiths?

      honestly this is exactly why I bring up the butch/femme thing-- it's essentially an example of a "binary" gender system that exists as a descendent/simulacrum of modern binary gender, but where genitals don't matter and where gender is a matter of personal self-determination. I legit was kinda wondering if you'd already been familiar with it before writing this post lol.

      the idea of this all secretly being far-future transhuman shit does kinda soothe the part of my brain that's screaming for a Gygaxian Naturalism applied to dwarven gender teleology lmao. who needs Gygaxian Naturalism if it's all basically Baudrillardian hyperreality anyway lol

      Delete
    10. Rereading this thread a year later and it's still interesting to relate stuff back to myself. Like, I didn't "choose" to heterosexual because I wanted to do Manly Stuff. I "chose" to be heterosexual because I like boobs.

      It's easy to look at the dwarves and recognize how entangled they are, but we're tangled up, too.

      Delete
    11. hey, bb, you know if you like tits but don't connect with doing Manly Stuff, you don't have to be a man, right? like, I know as a transsexual myself I'm personally inclined to see hints of transness wherever I look, but like, I'm here (and probably so are most other trannies!) if you need someone to talk about this with lol

      (signed, a trans girl whose trans boyfriend has fantastic tits)

      Delete
    12. ok I assume since you let the old comment get published you're maybe interested?? and I also probably definitely should've included some kind of contact info in the last post? you can contact me at @flaccidsewage on instagram if you want (it's my burner account lol)

      Delete
    13. no pressure tho, like, again, I like to make a habit of bringing new trannies into the world but that's just me paying forward the favors that were done for me 😌

      Delete
    14. Oh, I'm like 96% straight. But gender is super interesting to me because I grew up in the church and was homophobic until I got to college. Since then I've been slowly unpacking all the old assumptions. It's been a trip.

      I'm @aykemp on Instagram. Hardly ever on there, though. We should be friends.

      Delete
    15. messaged you from my main account ✨

      Delete
  3. Using dwarves as a means of exploring gender expression was definitely one of Pratchett's cleverest moves, and this is an excellent iteration of that theme.

    ReplyDelete
  4. When a dwarf couple arranges for a birth to happen, as described, is that considered mining or blacksmithing?

    I assume the father can be either the miner or the blacksmith? Is so, how is it determined which is the father?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Reproduction is neither mining not blacksmithing. Reproduction and gender are not connected.

      The father is the one who pays for it.

      Delete
    2. Okay, I updated the post to reflect this.

      Delete
    3. But the genetic father produces raw material that the genetic mother then refines, so shouldn't only miners be allowed to be genetic fathers and blacksmiths allowed to be genetic mothers?

      Delete
  5. Another great one by you, awesome to see you back at full force. But: While you do get into my first thought that "gender" might not be an ideal translation (and follow up by making a very good case that it is still the best option), I do wonder about the terms 'blacksmith' and 'miner' becaue that's probably where most of the confusion will stem from for a non-dwarf.
    Do I get right that a bachelor miner will not cook? Another great reason to move in togetheer, huh? And what about -buying- stuff? Can a single blacksmith buy raw materials or is that a queer thing to do? Or something simply not done in public?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Miners can cook and still fit their gender expectations. But if a miner says "oh I love to cook, it's my favorite hobby" or cooks especially fancy meals, then they start to seem a little un-minery. No different than humans, really.

      And there's nothing un-blacksmithy about buying raw materials. Everyone buys and sells.

      Delete
  6. This is fantastic, I adore it. There's a special place in my heart for people who use dwarves to fuck around with gender concepts ever since I read the Ankh-Morpork City Watch series as a kid

    ReplyDelete
  7. Fascinating! So happy to have you back at it, your work definitely gives me the motivation to keep working on my own blog!

    Dwarven relationships seem to be mostly monogamous, how do you imagine a polyamorous one would develop? Perhaps there's a citadel somewhere housed by a lineage of miners and blacksmiths, all enamored with one another!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Line marriages come to mind, The Moon is a Harsh Mistress had them and I'd imagine that the focus on continuity would appeal to dwarven conservatism (to say nothing of tomb maintainance planning).

      Delete
  8. > (They didn't realize that we sorted ourselves by gender, like farm animals or something.)
    Shouldn't this be "sorted ourselves by sex"?

    ReplyDelete
  9. I was wondering how dwarves handle unintended pregnancy when a married miner and a blacksmith have genitals that are compatible for reproduction and are having sex. Then it dawned finally dawned on me that secual intercourse is completely different from our understanding of sexual intercourse. The genitals never come intk play. Instead, dwarves having sex would look to humans like a sort of picnic and night in together. The couple would go off to where the miner can engage in their labor while the blacksmith watches or assists with minor things. They then go to the blacksmiths's workshop, where the blacksmith would use the materials gathered by the miner in producing something, again the miner can assist with mi or things. The end result is creation, not a child, but still a creation. I could see the blacksmith watching the miner work and saying "Yes, faster. Just like that."

    It also clarifies what infidelity is. If a miner gives something they gathered for free or a blacksmith shares or gives a product for free that's sex. Unlike human prostitution, if the interaction involves paying for the results of the labor, the dwarves aren't cheating or fornicating outside of marriage. It's just economics.

    It also means that when gift giving, the dwarf must either give money or the gift being given MUST have paid for it, rather than producing it themselves, otherwise, its an offer for sex. Perhaps dwarves keep receipts and make sure to hand the receipt over with the gift so the correctmessage is being spent. Imagine the shock of dwarves coming to non-dwarven lands and a household offering a free meal to them. "You...you want me to partake in an orgy? By Gox, you're children are here!" I guess that means that anything a father gives to their child has to be accounted for in the debts owed to them when the child comes of age. The father can offer a discount and that's comparable to a human parent kissing their child affectionately.

    And then there's bastardy. One of the greatest works of Dwarven craftsmanship in human society is a sword owned by some king. However, dwarves can't help but look at it with shame as some of the materials gathered and the work to craft it were done without payment between two dwarves who were married to others.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. not gonna lie, buddy, I feel like you've got a pretty limited understanding of HUMAN sexuality lmao. I'm a trans girl, my boyfriend's a trans guy, we've both got our original equipment intact, and while I can guarantee that our genitals come into play PLENTY there's way more than just dick-in-pussy penetration (that'd probably make us both dysphoric) to do with genitals in bed. you don't need to invent some wacky caricature to imaging a sexual culture with no pregnancy risks, I guarantee you the trannies are way ahead of you on this lol

      Delete
  10. Now I want to hear about the Cordyceps Diaspora, it sounds fascinating and horrific.

    ReplyDelete
  11. As a German and queer world builder this made complete sense.

    ReplyDelete
  12. "But the separation of sex from reproduction is one of the primary things that separates us from animals. And in fact, it's boggling that humans have so little self-control over it. It's as fundamental to society as using a toilet instead of shitting in your front yard. That's what makes us civilized. Why can't humans separate the two?"

    I am actually questioning real life human civility with this statement.

    ReplyDelete
  13. So... Elves have three genders: Concrete, Aesthete, and Condensate.

    Concretes are concerned with physical reality. They do things like hunt, farm, build, fight & do logistics, explore, play instruments, and they are historians.

    Aesthetes are concerned with making life beautiful to experience. They do things like cook, brew, design, invent fighting styles, compose music and they are playwrights.

    Condensates combine and innovate creations of Aesthetes and praxis of Concretes. They do things like breed new crops or herds, foreman on construction projects, train troops and general armies. They are philosophers and arcanists.

    All (traditional) elven marriages have one of each. Rarely do these triumvirates last longer than the project they were founded to work on. Say, 10 to 300 years, max.

    Many splinterings of the elves have occurred over the millennia as these roles changed in some populations (See the Drow and their Post-Empiricists, Meme-Aesthetes, and Meta-Condensates).

    If an elf wants to change their gender, they do so at a public ceremony. Most elves have done this many times over their lifetimes.

    Human culture tends to be a huge relief valve for the strictures of trad elven society. If an elf just wants to have a simple job or be asexual for a while, they can post up in a human town and get a job as a barkeep/assassin without worrying about all the social niceties of being at home.

    All elves have three parents. The logistics of this is not something they discuss with humans.

    ReplyDelete
  14. > And literally translating blacksmith is also misleading, too, since it can also refer to anyone who transforms raw materials into a more unfinished state.

    Should this be "transforms raw materials into a more FINISHED state"?

    ReplyDelete